by Julian Spivey
One of the greatest film scripts ever written
is without a doubt “12 Angry Men,” penned by Reginald Rose.
The film proves that great films can be made that
merely take place in a single room. In an age where computer graphics and special effects are used to hold an audience’s
lack of attention films like “12 Angry Men” (1957) and Alfred Hitchcock’s classic thriller “Rear Window”
(1954) are sadly lost in today’s society.
“12 Angry Men,” directed by Sidney
Lumet in his directorial debut, is the story about a jury trying to decide whether or not an unnamed, immigrant juvenile is
guilty of killing his own father. The story seems open and shut at the beginning of the film, until one of the jurors played
by Henry Fonda has doubts about the teen’s guiltiness. The rest of the film is brilliantly laid out in the juror’s
room as the twelve men go back in forth on why they think the teen is innocent or guilty.
The twelve actors, in order by juror number: Martin
Balsam, John Fiedler, Lee J. Cobb, E.G. Marshall, Jack Klugman, Edward Binns, Jack Warden, Fonda, Joseph Sweeney, Ed Begley,
George Voskovec and Robert Webber all portray their respective characters excellently.
“12 Angry Men” is truly one of the
few films in the history of cinema that includes almost flawless acting by the entire cast. The only minor flaw with the script
seems to be that Juror number 12, played by Webber, doesn’t seem as important throughout the film as the other eleven
jurors.
Every actor in the great ensemble cast does an
excellent job at bringing their character’s characteristics to the forefront during the film to get the audience to
identify with them, something that seems hard to do as the majority of the characters names are never mentioned. Only Fonda
and Sweeney’s characters exchange last names after the case is resolved at the film’s finale.
Fonda seems to be at his best when he’s
fighting for the little man or the innocent man as he does in this film as well as films like John Ford’s “The
Grapes of Wrath” (1940) and William A. Wellman’s “The Ox-Bow Incident” (1943). His naturalistic, every-man
type of acting really comes off in a special manner that few other actors have.
Cobb does a great job as the antagonist of the
story. His character, juror number three, seems to want the young teens head in a noose from the beginning and he remains
steadfast in his beliefs to the film’s very end.
The film is amazing in its many aspects, as it
provides views on such topics as communism, McCarthyism and racism. One of the film’s most moving scenes is when the
jurors all turn their backs on the racist attitudes and behavior of juror number 10, played by Begley.